Police and
Detection
The first demands for a professional police force
came in the 18th century. In 1829, the Home
Secretary, Robert Peel, was finally able to set up
the Metropolitan Police in London. The policemen,
or ‘peelers’, wore top hats and blue tail-coats with
identifying numbers on their collars.
Before organised law enforcement there were many different types of
voluntary and private ‘policemen’. An early type of policing from about 1285
was known as ‘watch and ward’. The term ‘watchmen’ derived from this,
men chosen from all households in the community to protect citizens at night.
Watch houses were established but dishonesty was widespread. The Night
Watch was started in Poole in 1756.
Crime appeared to be spreading from the towns and cities to rural areas
in the 1830s. In 1839, the Quarter Sessions were allowed by the County
Police Act to set up police districts, appoint chief constables and employ paid
policemen. Dorset’s first paid police force was in Sturminster Newton (1849).
Wimborne’s police force started in 1855, its station and magistrates’ court
eventually on Poole Road. A superintendent, sergeant and 10 constables
replaced the last parish constables, William Duffal and James Galpin.
A Dorset county police force was established in 1856. During his 31 years,
the second Chief Constable, also an army officer, insisted that every
man in the force grew a moustache and in 1894 introduced a
bicycle allowance of £3 per year. By 1930, the Force was
purchasing eight Norton motorcycles.
In the 19th century, policemen attended classes
at which they were taught to recognise the
features of criminals. For a time, people really
believed that a criminal could be spotted by
his facial features. The rural beat officer was
required to keep a ‘beat register’, including
a list of suspicious and bad characters; the
register for Sixpenny Handley survives.
|

In Anglo-Saxon times, every
male over 12 years old had to
belong to a group with nine
others, called a Tithing. Everyone had to be responsible for the
behaviour of the others in the group.
If one of them broke the law, the
others would take him to court. If
they didn't, they were all held responsible for the crime and would
have to be fined or punished.
Do you think this is fair?
|